• Plans
    • Basic Plan
    • Pro Plan
    • Business Plan
  • Features
  • Sign-Up
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Login | Contact Us

BellesLink

A people search platform businesses use to find and contact customers.

  • Plans
    • Basic Plan Data when you need it
    • Pro Plan Make more contacts
    • Business Plan Drive your business
    • Belleslink Pricing
  • Features
  • Demos
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • About
  • Sign Up »
You are here: Home / Best Practices for Skip Tracing / Ringless Voicemail Is Ruled Out

Ringless Voicemail Is Ruled Out

August 13, 2018 By Paul Kulas Leave a Comment

Ringless Voicemail creates liability under the TCPA regualtions.
A federal district court judge has ruled that ringless voicemails and voicemail drops are in fact “calls” and fall within the purview of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) allowing the lawsuit of Saunders v. Dyck O’Neal, 17-cv-335, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121076 in the Western District of Michigan to proceed.

The Court’s Opinion

Defendant Dyck O’Neal argued that “direct drop” voicemails are not “calls” under the TCPA. His argument was based on the contention that: 1) it did not dial Plaintiff’s cellphone number, but rather merely “deposited” the voicemail directly on a voicemail server without placing a call to plaintiff’s mobile phone; 2) voicemail is “an information or enhanced service”, as opposed to a “telecommunications service”, and therefore is not regulated under the TCPA.

The court disagreed, saying the “effect on Saunders is the same whether her phone rang with a call before the voicemail is left, or whether the voicemail is left directly in her voicemail box, i.e., Saunders receives a notification on her phone that she has a new voicemail.” Based on this interruption, the court held that that “Dyck O’Neal’s use of direct to voicemail technology is a ‘call’ and falls within the purview of the TCPA”.

What This Means for Marketers

Violations of the TCPA are no small matter. The penalties can be costly, often up to $1,500 per call. The case of Saunders v. Dyck O’Neal is not the first litigation dealing with ringless voicemail, it’s just the first one to go before a federal judge and receive an opinion. The FCC received requests for a ruling on the technology as early as 2014 but to date has not.

Businesses who use the ringless voicemail should tread carefully and fully consider the TCPA liability. At least one court has been clear in saying defendants “cannot skirt the statute.”

You’re Not Too Small to be at Risk

It is common for small businesses to believe these issues don’t effect them and they can continue to violate the TCPA rules because they are too small to show up on the radar of regulators. It is not regulators who act first to bring these cases to court, it is class-action lawyers advocating for consumer rights. Regardless how you feel about the litigious nature of our country, it’s risky to underestimate the opportunistic nature of these consumer advocates.

BellesLink and the TCPA

As a company we work to maintain compliance with all federal and state regulations regarding public records data and telecommunications. As a customer you can feel confident that our products for data, phone, and text are built to be effective and also fully compliant.

Enjoy this Article? Please Share.

Filed Under: Best Practices for Skip Tracing, Compliance, Compliance In Skip Tracing, News from BellesLink Tagged With: Compliance, Ringless Voicemail, TCPA

About Paul Kulas

Paul Kulas is the founder, and Head Belle Ringer, of Belles Camp Communications LLC and BellesLink.com. When Paul isn’t working he’s skiing or discovering his next big idea while playing in the mountains right outside Belles Camp’s door in Eagle, CO. | Connect on Linkedin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe

Social

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Search

Categories

  • Batch People Search (15)
  • Best Practices for Skip Tracing (47)
    • Burner Phones & Apps (2)
    • Call Tracking (2)
    • Cell Phone Pinging (5)
    • Compliance In Skip Tracing (17)
    • Custom Messages (2)
    • Database Searches (11)
    • Non-Compliant Practices (9)
    • Recording Phone Calls (1)
    • Truth in Caller ID Act (6)
  • Bulk Skip Tracing (16)
  • Compliance (3)
  • Featured (3)
  • Find People (3)
  • Mobile App (3)
  • News from BellesLink (26)
  • Paulie Staying Home Playlist (4)
  • People Search (12)
  • Resources (1)
  • Sales Dialer (9)
  • Virtual Phone & Text (10)
  • Basic Plan
  • Pro Plan
  • Business Plan
  • Features
  • Demos
  • Pricing
  • Sign-Up
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Qualifications
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Contact Us
    • Affiliates
    • Login
Follow us on Linkedin and Facebook

 

© 2018 Belles Camp Communications | Privacy Policy | Terms of Services

 

© 2020 BellesLink

We use cookies. By using this site you accept and agree to our Privacy Policy.
For more information see our privacy policy.

Please share your location to continue